Third-party ratings: due diligence and disclosure requirements
An advertisement may not include any third-party rating unless: (1) the adviser has a reasonable basis for believing that any questionnaire or survey used in the preparation of the third-party rating is structured to make it equally easy for a participant to provide favorable and unfavorable responses, and is not designed or prepared to produce any predetermined result; and (2) the advertisement clearly and prominently discloses, or the adviser reasonably believes that the third-party rating clearly and prominently discloses (i) the date on which the rating was given and the period of time upon which the rating was based; (ii) the identity of the third party that created and tabulated the rating; and (iii) if applicable, that compensation has been provided directly or indirectly by the adviser in connection with obtaining or using the third-party rating.
What violations look like
Morningstar awarded us a five-star rating last month.
Why it's flagged: Third-party ratings require disclosure of: who created the rating, the period it covers, the criteria/methodology, and whether any compensation flowed to the rating provider. Risk Alert 12/16/25 specifically called out advisers who skipped due-diligence here.
Morningstar awarded our growth strategy a five-star rating in its November 2025 review (rating covers the 3-year period ending September 30, 2025; methodology at morningstar.com/research/methodology). No compensation was paid to Morningstar for this rating.
As featured in Barron's, Forbes, and The Wall Street Journal.
Why it's flagged: Press mentions used as marketing carry endorsement risk. Dates, context (was it a paid placement?), and the nature of the feature must be disclosed. Stale or sponsored "featured in" badges are a recurring exam finding.
List specific articles with publication date and a link, e.g., "Barron's, Top Independent Advisers (September 2024)."
Run Rule 206(4)-1(c) on your own copy.
Paste any draft — LinkedIn post, newsletter, website copy — and Safe to Publish flags the Rule 206(4)-1(c) issues with citations to the rule and a suggested rewrite.
Start free trial →This page is for educational purposes and is not legal advice. Safe to Publish is not a law firm. Compliance decisions remain the responsibility of the registered investment adviser. See Terms.