← All rule pages
Rule 206(4)-1(b)(3)

Testimonial/endorsement: adviser oversight and written agreement requirement

testimonialendorsementwritten-agreementoversightde-minimis
Excerpted verbatim from the rule

The adviser has a reasonable basis for believing that any testimonial or endorsement disseminated complies with the requirements of this section, and the adviser has entered into a written agreement with any person giving a testimonial or endorsement for compensation describing the scope of the agreed-upon activities and the terms of the compensation for those activities, except where the compensation is de minimis (e.g., $1,000 or less, in cash or non-cash, during the preceding twelve months).

Source: 17 CFR § 275.206(4)-1 on eCFR.

What violations look like

LinkedIn

An RIA pays a finance YouTuber $5,000 for a "Sponsored by [Firm]" segment under a handshake deal — no written promoter agreement on file.

Why it's flagged: A written promoter agreement is mandatory whenever the promoter receives more than de minimis compensation ($1,000 or less in 12 months). The firm is liable for the promoter’s statements regardless of whether an agreement exists.

Compliant rewrite

Sign a written promoter agreement before the campaign runs. The agreement should specify compensation terms, the scope of statements the promoter is authorized to make, and the disclosure language they must include in the segment.

Brochure

A CPA refers clients to the RIA for a 10% revenue share on the first year of fees — no written agreement on file.

Why it's flagged: The same rule applies to solicitor and referral arrangements, not just public-facing endorsements. The CPA is a "promoter" for Marketing Rule purposes the moment compensation flows.

Compliant rewrite

Execute a written referral agreement specifying the comp split, the disclosures the CPA must give referred clients about the comp arrangement, and the firm’s ongoing oversight obligations.

Run Rule 206(4)-1(b)(3) on your own copy.

Paste any draft — LinkedIn post, newsletter, website copy — and Safe to Publish flags the Rule 206(4)-1(b)(3) issues with citations to the rule and a suggested rewrite.

Start free trial →

This page is for educational purposes and is not legal advice. Safe to Publish is not a law firm. Compliance decisions remain the responsibility of the registered investment adviser. See Terms.